Skip to main content
Reports
- David Freeman Engstrom, Daniel E. Ho, Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar, and Catherine M. Sharkey, Government by Algorithm: Artificial Intelligence in Federal Administrative Agencies, Report to the Administrative Conference of the United States (January 2020)
- OECD Digital Government Studies, The Path to Becoming a Data-Driven Public Sector (November 28, 2019)
- Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Abuses of the Federal Notice-and-Comment Rulemaking Process (October 2019)
- Partnership for Public Service and The IBM Center for The Business of Government, More Than Meets AI: Part II (July 25, 2019)
- Partnership for Public Service and The IBM Center for The Business of Government, More Than Meets AI (February 20, 2019)
- Todd Rubin, Regulations.gov and FDMS Final Report, Report Prepared for the Administrative Conference of the United States (December 1, 2018)
- Michael Sant’ Ambrogio and Glen Staszewski, Public Engagement with Agency Rulemaking, Report Prepared for the Administrative Conference of the United States (November 19, 2018)
- OECD Digital Government Studies, Open Government Data Report: Enhancing Policy Maturity for Sustainable Impact (September 27, 2018)
- Jane Wiseman, Data-Driven Government: The Role of Chief Data Officers, The IBM Center for The Business of Government (September 18, 2018)
- Douglas Lute and Frank Taylor, Integrating and Analyzing Data Across Governments – the Key to 21st Century Security, The IBM Center for The Business of Government (August 29, 2018)
- Gregory Dawson, A Roadmap for IT Modernization in Government, The IBM Center for The Business of Government (March 15, 2018)
- Kevin C. Desouza, Delivering Artificial Intelligence in Government: Challenges and Opportunities, The IBM Center for The Business of Government (February 28, 2018)
- Partnership for Public Service and The IBM Center for The Business of Government, Using Artificial Intelligence to Transform Government (January 8, 2018)
- The IBM Center for The Business of Government, Transforming Government Through Technology(March 26, 2017)
- Sukumar Ganapati, Using Mobile Apps in Government, The IBM Center for The Business of Government (January 13, 2016)
- Sherri Greenberg, Using Innovation and Technology to Improve City Services, The IBM Center for The Business of Government (April 9, 2015)
- Michael E. Herz, Using Social Media in Rulemaking: Possibilities and Barriers, Final Report to the Administrative Conference of the United States (November 21, 2013)
- Leland E. Beck, Agency Practices and Judicial Review of Administrative Records in Informal Rulemaking Report, Final report to the Administrative Conference of the United States (May 14, 2013)
- Cary Coglianese, Federal Agency Use of Electronic Media in the Rulemaking Process, Final Report to the Administrative Conference of the United States (December 5, 2011)
- Bridget C.E. Dooling, Legal Issues in e-Rulemaking: A Report to the Administrative Conference of the United States, Report to the Administrative Conference of the United States (March 17, 2011)
- Carolyn J. Lukensmeyer, Joe Goldman and David Stern, Assessing Public Participation in an Open Government Era: A Review of Federal Agency Plans, IBM Center for The Business of Government (2011)
- Jon Gant and Nicol Turner-Lee, Government Transparency: Six Strategies for More Open and Participatory Government, Aspen Institute (February 25, 2011)
- Lead in the Environment Deliberation Final Report, Deliberative E-Rulemaking Project at State University of New York at Albany (2009)
- Darrell M. West, State and Federal Electronic Government in the United States, 2008 (2008)
- Committee on the Status and Future of Federal e-Rulemaking, Achieving the Potential: The Future of Federal e-Rulemaking (2008)
- Cary Coglianese, Heather Kilmartin, & Evan Mendelson, Transparency and Public Participation in the Rulemaking Process (2008)
- OMB Watch/Center for Democracy & Technology, Hiding in Plain Sight: Why Important Government Information Cannot Be Found Through Commercial Search Engines (December 11, 2007)
- Stuart W. Shulman, eRulemaking at the Crossroads (May 2006) (collection of white papers by various authors)
- Stuart W. Shulman, The Internet Still Might (but Probably Won’t) Change Everything: Stakeholder Views on the Future of Electronic Rulemaking (2004)
- Cary Coglianese, E-Rulemaking: Information Technology and Regulatory Policy, Regulatory Policy Program Report No. RPP-05 (2004) (subsequently published as Cary Coglianese, E-Rulemaking: Information Technology and the Regulatory Process, Administrative Law Review 56: 353-402 (2004))
- Lisa Thrane, E-Rulemaking Agency Representatives Focus Group Report (October, 2003)
- Lisa Thrane, E-Rulemaking Interest Group Representatives Focus Group Report (October, 2003)
- Henry H. Perritt, Jr., Electronic Dockets: Use of Information Technology in Rulemaking and Adjudication, Report to the Administrative Conference of the United States (October 19, 1995)
- Henry H. Perritt, Jr., Federal Agency Electronic Records Management and Archives, Report Prepared for the Administrative Conference of the United States (December 1, 1990).
- Henry H. Perritt, Jr., Electronic Acquisition And Release of Federal Agency Information, Report Prepared for the Administrative Conference of the United States (October 1, 1988).
Papers
- Russell L. Weaver, Rulemaking in an Internet Era: Dealing with Bots, Trolls & “Form Letters”, 27 George Mason Law Review 553 (2020)
- Manya Wadhwa, Silvio Amir, and Mark Dredze, Aligning Public Feedback to Requests for Comments on Regulations.gov, 14 Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 974 (May 26, 2020)
- Steven J. Balla, Alexander R. Beck, Elizabeth Meehan and Aryamala Prasad, Lost in the Flood?: Agency Responsiveness to Mass Comment Campaigns in Administrative Rulemaking, George Washington Regulatory Studies Center (May 26, 2020)
- Connor Raso and Bruce R. Kraus, Upvoting the Administrative State (April 2, 2020)
- Oren Perez, Collaborative e-Rulemaking, Democratic Bots, and the Future of Digital Democracy, Digital Government: Research and Practice (February 2020)
- Anastasia Deligiaouri and Jane Suiter, Evaluation of Public Consultations and Citizens’ Participation in 2015 Better Regulation Agenda of the EU and The Need for a Deliberative E-Rulemaking Initiative in the EU, European Politics and Society (February 6, 2020)
- Benjamin R. Pflughoeft and Ingrid E. Schneider, Social Media as E-participation: Can A Multiple Hierarchy Stratification Perspective Predict Public Interest?, Government Information Quarterly (January 2020)
- Steven J. Balla, GSA’s Mass and Fake Comments Meeting, George Washington Regulatory Studies Center (January 30, 2020)
- Chaebong Nam, Behind the Interface: Human Moderation for Deliberative Engagement in an eRulemaking Discussion, Government Information Quarterly (January 2020)
- Caroline Cecot and Robert W. Hahn, Transparency in Agency Cost-Benefit Analysis, ABA Administrative Law Review (2020)
- Cary Coglianese and David Lehr, Transparency and Algorithmic Governance, Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law (2019)
- Vanessa Duguay, Views or Votes: The Challenge of Mass Comments in Rulemaking, 26 George Mason Law Review 625 (2019)
- Brandi Vincent, GSA, FCC Exploring New Ways to Combat Comment Bots and Abusers (October 24, 2019)
- Steven J. Balla, Alexander R. Beck, William C. Cubbison and Aryamala Prasad, Where’s the Spam? Interest Groups and Mass Comment Campaigns in Agency Rulemaking, George Washington Regulatory Studies Center (September 27, 2019)
- Vlad Eidelman and Brian Grom, Argument Identification in Public Comments from eRulemaking, ICAIL’19: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (June 2019)
- Sara R. Jordan and K. Lee Watson, Reexamining Rulemaking in an Era of Internet-Enabled Participation, Public Performance & Management Review (May 7, 2019)
- Daniel A. Lyons, E-Rulemaking and the Politicization of the Comment Process, 13 Perspectives from FSF Scholars 40 (October 23, 2018)
- Oren Perez, Judit Bar-Ilan, Tali Gazit, Noa Aharony, Yair Amichai-Hamburger and Jenny Bronstein, The Prospects of E-Democracy: An Experimental Study of Collaborative E-Rulemaking, 15 Journal of Information Technology & Politics 278 (September 5, 2018)
- Aryamala Prasad, Quality, not Quantity, is Key to Effective Commenting, George Washington Regulatory Studies Center (February 20, 2018)
- Jack Karsten and Darrell M. West, Net Neutrality Debate Exposes Weaknesses of Public Comment System(January 18, 2018)
- Michael A. Livermore, Vladimir Eidelman and Brian Grom, Computationally Assisted Regulatory Participation, Notre Dame Law Review (January 2018)
- Paul Hitlin, Kenneth Olmstead and Skye Toor, Public Comments to the Federal Communications Commission About Net Neutrality Contain Many Inaccuracies and Duplicates, Pew Research Center (November 29, 2017)
- Rachel Augustine Potter, More than Spam? Lobbying the EPA Through Public Comment Campaigns(November 29, 2017)
- Melissa Mortazavi, Rulemaking Ex Machina, 117 Columbia Law Review 202 (September 22, 2017)
- Stephen M. Johnson, # Better Rules: The Appropriate Use of Social Media in Rulemaking, 44 The Florida State University Law Review 1379 (2017)
- Mary J. Newhart and Joshua D. Brooks, Barriers to participatory eRulemaking Platform Adoption: Lessons Learned from RegulationRoom, Cornell e-Rulemaking Initiative Publications 19 (May 2017)
- Lauren Moxley, E-Rulemaking and Democracy, 68 ABA Administrative Law Review 661 (2016)
- Daniel Rauch, Two-Track E-Commenting, 33 Yale Journal on Regulation 303 (2016)
- Dmitry Epstein and Gilly Leshed, The Magic Sauce: Practices of Facilitation in Online Policy Deliberation, Journal of Public Deliberation (June 4, 2016)
- Franciska Coleman, Improving E-Participation and Democratic Legitimacy Through Administrative Rulemaking in Korea and the U.S., Korea Legislation Research Institute (2016)
- Michael Herz, E-Rulemaking’s Democratic Transformation: Anticipated, Actual, and Potential, International Journal of Open Governments (2016)
- Stephen M. Johnson, Beyond the Usual Suspects: ACUS, Rulemaking 2.0, and A Vision for Broader, More Informed, and More Transparent Rulemaking, 65 ABA Administrative Law Review 77 (2013)
- Jennifer Shkabatur, Transparency With(out) Accountability: Open Government in the United States, 31 Yale Law & Policy Review 79 (2012)
- John T. Snead, Social media use in the U.S. Executive branch, 30 Government Information Quarterly 56 (January 2013)
- Cary Coglianese, Enhancing Public Access to Online Rulemaking Information, 2 Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law 1 (December 2012)
- Nina A. Mendelson, Response Essay: Should Mass Comments Count?, 2 Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law 173 (November 15, 2012)
- Cynthia Farina, Dmitry Epstein, Josiah Heidt and Mary J. Newhart, Knowledge in the People: Rethinking “Value” in Public Rulemaking Participation, Cornell E-Rulemaking Initiatives (November 13, 2012)
- Mendy Fisch, Pitting Robots Against Spammers in Rulemaking Comment Wars, Blog for the Columbia Science and Technology Law Review (November 1, 2012)
- Stephen M. Johnson, Beyond the Usual Suspects: ACUS, Rulemaking 2.0 and a Vision for Broader, More Informed and More Transparent Rulemaking, Mercer University Law School (August 1, 2012)
- Peter Muhlberger, Jenny Stromer-Galley and Nick Webb, “An Experiment in E-Rulemaking with Natural Language Processing and Democratic Deliberation,” in Kathryn Kloby & Maria J. D’Agostino, Citizen 2.0: Public and Governmental Interaction through Web 2.0 Technologies (March 2012)
- Cary Coglianese, Open Government and Its Impact, RegBlog (May 8, 2011)
- Cynthia R. Farina, Mary Newhart, Josiah Heidt & CeRI, Rulemaking vs. Democracy: Judging and Nudging Public Participation that Counts, 2 Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law 123 (May 8, 2012)
- Cynthia R. Farina et. al., Rulemaking 2.0, 65 U. Miami L. Rev. 395 (2011)
- David Karpf, Online Political Mobilization from the Advocacy Group’s Perspective: Looking Beyond Clicktivism, 4 Policy & Internet 7 (December 2010)
- Cynthia R. Farina, Achieving the Potential: The Future of Federal E- Rulemaking, Report of the Committee on the Status and Future of Federal e-Rulemaking 62 Administrative Law Review 279 (2010)
- Cynthia R. Farina, Rulemaking in 140 Characters or Less: Social Networking and Public Participation in Rulemaking, 31 Pace Law Review 382 (2010)
- Cary Coglianese, E-Government and Inequality in Public Participation, RegBlog, October 27, 2010
- Jeffery S. Lubbers, A Survey of Federal Agency Rulemakers’ Attitudes About E-Rulemaking, 62 Administrative Law Review 451 (2010)
- Gregory Jones, Comment: Electronic Rulemaking in the New Age of Openness: Proposing a Voluntary Two-Tier Registration System for Regulations.gov, 62 Administrative Law Review 1261 (Fall 2010)
- Jeannine E. Reilley and Meghna Sabharwal. Perceptions of Transparency of Government Policymaking: A Cross-National Study, 26 Government Information Quarterly 148 (January 2009)
- Seongcheol Kim, et al., An Institutional Analysis of an E-Government System for Anti-Corruption: The Case of OPEN, 26 Government Information Quarterly 42 (January 2009)
- Stuart W. Shulman, The Case Against Mass E-mails: Perverse Incentives and Low Quality Public Participation in U.S. Federal Rulemaking, 1 Policy & Internet 23-31 (2009)
- David M. Shafie, Participation in E-Rulemaking: Interest Groups and the Standard-Setting Process for Hazardous Air Pollutants, 5 Journal of Information Technology & Politics 399-410 (2008)
- Jerry Brito, Improving Government Transparency Online, 37 The Public Manager 22 Spring 2008
- Julianne Mahler & Priscilla M. Regan, Agency-Related Blogs as Forums for Policy Networks (2008)
- Claire Cardie, Cynthia Farina, Adil Aijaz, Matt Rawding & Stephen Purpura, A Study in Rule-Specific Issue Categorization for e-Rulemaking (2008)
- Stephen Purpura, Claire Cardie & Jesse Simons, Active Learning for e-Rulemaking: Public Comment Categorization (2008)
- Claire Cardie, Cynthia Farina, Matt Rawding & Adil Aijaz, An eRulemaking Corpus: Identifying Substantive Issues in Public Comments (2008)
- Beth Simone Noveck, Wiki Government, Democracy (Winter 2008)
- David Schlosberg, Democracy and E-Rulemaking: Web-Based Technologies, Participation, and the Potential for Deliberation, 4 Journal of Information Technology & Politics 37-55 (2007)
- Gopal Raman, The EPA EDOCKET System, in Governance and Information Technology: From Electronic Government to Information Government (Viktor Mayer-Schoenberger & David Lazer, eds. 2007)
- David M. Shafie, E-Rulemaking and Environmental Policy, 1996-2006 (2007)
- Stuart Shulman, Click Through Democracy (2007)
- Chee Wei Phang & Atreyi Kankanhalli, The Current State and Future of E-Participation Research (2007)
- Jaime Arguello & Jamie Callan, A Bootstrapping Approach for Identifying Stake Holders in Public-Comment Corporations (2007)
- Nahmee Kwon & Eduard Hovy, Information Acquisition using Multiple Classifications (2007)
- Eduard Hovy, Emily Huisman, Nahmee. Kwon & Stuart Shulman, Tools for Rules: Technology Transfer and Electronic Rulemaking (2007)
- Namhee Kwon, Eduard Hovy & Stuart Shulman, “Identifying and Classifying Subjective Claims” (May 2007).
- Stuart Shapiro & Cary Coglianese, First Generation E-Rulemaking: An Assessment of Regulatory Agency Websites (April 2007)
- Steven J. Balla & Benjamin M. Daniels, Information Technology and Public Commenting on Agency Regulations, Regulation & Governance (March 2007)
- Cary Coglianese, Weak Democracy, Strong Information: The Role of Information Technology in the Rulemaking Process, in Governance and Information Technology: From Electronic Government to Information Government (Viktor Mayer-Schoenberger & David Lazer, eds. 2007)
- Namhee Kwon et. al., Multidimensional Text Analysis for eRulemaking (2006)
- Hui Yang et. al., Next Steps in Near-Duplicate Detection for eRulemaking (2006)
- Julianne Mahler & Priscilla M. Regan, Federal Agencies and the Evolution of Web Governance (2006)
- Stacey D. Schesser, A New Domain for Public Speech: Opening Public Spaces Online, 94 Cal. L.Rev. 1791 (2006)
- Christine M. Reed, Rulemaking and Small Local Governments: Barriers to Participation, 31 SPG Admin. & Reg. L. News 20 (2006)
- Mack Shelley, Lisa Thrane & Stuart Shulman, Generational Differences in Informational Technology Use and Political Involvement (2006)
- Mack Shelley, Lisa Thrane & Stuart Shulman, Lost in Cyberspace: Barriers to Bridging the Digital Divide in e-Politics (2006)
- Stuart M. Benjamin, Evaluating E-Rulemaking: Public Participation and Political Institutions (2006)
- Cary Coglianese, E-Rulemaking, in Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko and Matti Malkia, eds., Encyclopedia of Digital Government (Idea, 2006) (reprinted in Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko, Electronic Government: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (IGI Global, 2008))
- Cary Coglianese, Congressional Testimony on E-Rulemaking, Before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law (July 2006)
- Cary Coglianese, Citizen Participation in Rulemaking: Past, Present, and Future, Duke Law Journal (2006)
- Claire Cardie, Cynthia Farina, & Thomas Bruce, Using Natural Language Processing to Improve eRulemaking: Project Highlight (May 2006)
- Cynthia Farina, Claire Cardie, Thomas Bruce, & Erica Wagner, Better Inputs for Better Outcomes: Using the Interface to Improve e-Rulemaking (May 2006)
- Stuart Shulman, Jamie Callan, Eduard Hovy, & Stephen Zavestoski, “Language Processing Technology for Electronic Rulemaking: A Project Highlight” (May 2006)
- Namhee Kwon, Stuart Shulman, and Eduard Hovy, “Multidimensional Text Analysis for eRulemaking” (May 2006).
- Grace Hui Yang, Jamie Callan, and Stuart Shulman, “Next Steps in Near Duplicate Detection for eRulemaking” (May 2006).
- Stuart W. Shulman, “Whither Deliberation? Mass e-Mail Campaigns and U.S. Regulatory Rulemaking”Journal of E-Government (2006)
- Stephen Zavestoski, Stuart Shulman, and David Schlosberg, “Democracy and the Environment on the Internet: Electronic Citizen Participation in Regulatory Rulemaking,” Science, Technology & Human Values(2006)
- Kincho Law, Gloria Lau & Gio Wiederhold, Legal Information Retrieval and Application to e-Rulemaking(2005)
- Cary Coglianese, Stuart Shapiro & Stephen Balla, Unifying Rulemaking Information: Recommendations for the New Federal Docket Management System (2005)
- Cary Coglianese, Expanding Regulatory Pluralism: The Role of Information Technology in Rulemaking(2005)
- Stuart W. Shulman, “eRulemaking: Issues in Current Research and Practice,” International Journal of Public Administration (2005)
- Beth Simone Noveck, “The Future of Citizen Participation in the Electronic State,” I/S Journal (Winter 2005)
- Cary Coglianese, “The Internet and Citizen Participation in Rulemaking,” I/S Journal (Winter 2005)
- Steven J. Balla, “Between Commenting and Negotiation: The Contours of Public Participation in Agency Rulemaking,” I/S Journal (Winter 2005)
- Gloria T. Lau, Kincho Law, and Gio Wiederhold, “A Relatedness Analysis Tool for Comparing Drafted Regulations and the Associated Public Comments,” I/S Journal (Winter 2005)
- Stuart W. Shulman, “The Internet Still Might (But Probably Won’t) Change Everything,” I/S Journal (Winter 2005)
- Peter M. Shane, Turning GOLD into EPG: Lessons from Low-Tech Democratic Experimentalism for Electronic Rulemaking and Other Ventures in Cyberdemocracy, I/S Journal (Winter 2005)
- Susan E. Dudley & Richard D. Otis, eRulemaking: A Case Example of eGov Transformation (June 13, 2005)
- Stuart W. Shulman and Mack C. Shelley, “Give the People What They Want: Research Notes from the Hunt for Better Rulemaking” (May 2005)
- David Schlosberg, Stephen Zavestoski, & Stuart Shulman, ‘To Submit a Form or Not to Submit a Form, That is the (Real) Question’: Deliberation and Mass Participation in U.S. Regulatory Rulemaking (2005)
- Cary Coglianese, Stuart Shapiro & Steven Balla, Unifying Rulemaking Information: Recommendations on the New Federal Docket Management System, Administrative Law Review 57: 621-645 (2005)
- Marc Holzer, Restoring Trust in Government: The Potential of Digital Citizen Participation (2004)
- Devin M. Ceartas, “Thoughts on E-Rulemaking” (June 2004).
- Beth Simone Noveck, “The Electronic Revolution in Rulemaking,” Emory Law Journal (2004).
- Peter L. Strauss, “The ABA Ad Law Section’s E Rulemaking Survey,” Administrative and Regulatory Law News(Spring 2004).
- Michael Herz,“E-Rulemaking,” in Jeffrey S. Lubbers, ed., Developments in Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice, 2002-2003 (ABA Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice, 2004).
- Cary Coglianese, “Information Technology and Regulatory Policy: New Directions for Digital Government Research,” Social Science Computer Review (2004).
- Barry Solomon and Ying Han, “Web-Based Environmental Regulatory Updates: A 50-State Survey,” ChemAlliance.org (February 4, 2004).
- Gloria T. Lau, Shawn Kerrigan & Kincho H. Law, An Information Infrastructure for Government Regulations(2003)
- Stuart W. Shulman, Lisa Thrane, & Mack C. Shelley, “eRulemaking,” Handbook of Public Information Systems, 2nd ed. (December, 2003)
- Michael B. Gerrard and Michael Herz, “Harnessing Information Technology to Improve the Environmental Impact Review Process,” NYU Environmental Law Journal, Vol. 12, No. 1 (October, 2003).
- Stuart Shulman, “eRulemaking: Issues in Current Research & Practice” (2003).
- Shawn Kerrigan and Kincho H. Law, “Logic-Based Regulation Compliance-Assistance,” Submitted to the Ninth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2003), June 24-28, 2003, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, (June 2003).
- Shawn Kerrigan, Charles Heenan, Haoyi Wang, Kincho H. Law, and Gio Wiederhold,“Regulatory Information Management and Compliance Assistance,” Proceedings of the National Conference on Digital Government Research, Boston, MA, (May 2003).
- Thomas C. Beierle, “Discussing the Rules: Electronic Rulemaking and Democratic Deliberation,” Resources for the Future (April, 2003).
- Barbara H. Brandon and Robert D. Carlitz, “Online Rulemaking and Other Tools for Strengthening our Civic Infrastructure,” Administrative Law Review (2003).
- Cary Coglianese, “The Internet and Public Participation in Rulemaking,” Regulatory Policy Program Working Paper RPP-2003-05. Cambridge, MA: Center for Business and Government, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University (2003).
- Robert W. Hahn & Robert E. Litan, “Recommendations for Improving Regulatory Accountability and Transparency,” (March 2003).
- Robert W. Hahn & Mary Beth Muething, “The Grand Experiment in Regulatory Reporting,” (March 2003).
- Robert D. Carlitz and Rosemary W. Gunn, “Once in a Lifetime: Opportunities for Civic Engagement” (February 10, 2003)
- Robert D. Carlitz and Rosemary W. Gunn, “Online Rulemaking: Next Steps” (February 1, 2003)
- Jane Fountain, “Prospects for Improving the Regulatory Process Using E-Rulemaking,” Communications of the ACM 46:63 (January 2003)
- Eduard Hovy, “e-Rulemaking: Research Problems for IT,” (January 2003).
- Boris Katz, Roger Hurwitz, Jimmy J. Lin and Ozlem Uzuner, “Better Public Policy Through Natural Language Information Access,” MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (2003).
- Gloria T. Lau, Kincho H. Law and Gio Wiederhold, “Similarity Analysis on Government Regulations,” (2003).
- Stuart W. Shulman, David Schlosberg, Steve Zavestoski and David Courard-Hauri, “Electronic Rulemaking: A Public Participation Research Agenda for the Social Sciences,” (2003).
- Stuart W. Shulman, “An Experiment in Digital Government at the United States National Organic Program,” (2003).
- Christopher Weare and J. Woody Stanley, “The Effects of Internet Use on Political Participation: Evidence from Agency Online Discussion Forum,” (2003).
- Gio Wiederhold and Kincho Law, “IT Support for e-Rulemaking,” Stanford University (2003).
- Stephen Zavestoski, Stuart W. Shulman and David Schlosberg, “Democracy and the Environment on the Internet: Electronic Citizen Participation in Regulatory Rulemaking,” (2003).
- Genie N. L. Stowers, “The State of Federal Websites: The Pursuit of Excellence,” (August, 2002).
- Robert D. Carlitz and Rosemary W. Gunn, “Online Rulemaking: A Step Toward E-Governance,” Government Information Quarterly, 19:389-405 (June, 2002)
- Elena Larsen & Lee Rainie, “The Rise of the E-Citizen: How People Use Government Agencies’ Web Sites,” Pew Internet and American Life Project (April 3, 2002).
- Jeffrey S. Lubbers, “The Future of Electronic Rulemaking: A Research Agenda,” Regulatory Policy Program Working Paper RPP-2002-04. Cambridge, MA: Center for Business and Government, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University (2002).
- Stuart W. Shulman and David Schlosberg, “Electronic Rulemaking: New Frontiers in Public Participation,” (2002).
- Stephen Zavestoski and Stuart W. Shulman, “The Internet and Environmental Decision Making,” (2002).
- JoAnne Holman and Michael A. McGregor, “’Thank You for Taking the Time to Read This:’ Public Participation via New Communication Technologies at the FCC,” Journalism & Communication Monographs Vol. 2 (4), (Winter 2001): 158-202.
- Stuart W. Shulman, “Citizen Agenda-Setting: The Electronic Collection and Synthesis Of Public Commentary in the Regulatory Rulemaking Process,” (2001).
- Peter L. Strauss, “Recommendations on Government Development of Internet Use,” prepared for the Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice Section of the American Bar Association, (February 2001).
- Keith B. Belton, “What if Everyone Were a Policy Analyst?” Regulation (Fall, 2000).
- Robert W. Hahn, How Changes in the Federal Register Can Help Improve Regulatory Accountability, September 1998, subsequently published in volume 52 of the Administrative Law Review (2000).
- John O’Looney, “Electronic Policy and Rulemaking” (2000).
- Stuart W. Shulman, “Citizen Agenda-Setting, Digital Government, and the National Organic Program,” (2000).
- Michele Ferenz and Colin Rule. “RULENET: An Experiment in Online Consensus Building.” The Consensus Building Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement. Ed. Lawrence Susskind, Sarah McKearnan and Jennifer Thomas-Larmer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., (1999). 879-898.
- Stephen Johnson, “The Internet Changes Everything: Revolutionizing Public Participation and Access to Government Information through the Internet,” Administrative Law Review 50: 277 (1998).
- Henry H. Perritt, Jr., “Electronic Freedom of Information,” 50 Administrative Law Review 391 (1998).